I listen to the responses to Representative Weiner’s predicament. An eye-winking press cites a long history of this type of behavior in men who have otherwise been judged as good leaders.
Outraged supporters go a step further to say that if people would just ignore You Tube and all the issues that get us off track, the country would be better off. They believe that issues like the state of marriage and family take us off track when we should be worried about the economy and the environment. He is doing a good job for his constituents, they say. What he does in the privacy of his own gymnasium is his own business.
But is not private, it is a public display of a complete lack of integrity. Integrity is the steadfast adherence to a moral or ethical code. What belief system or code of behavior does this sneaking around serve?
We have been served well by good men whose public and private lives have survived intense scrutiny. John Adams comes to mind. We have possibly been served well by scoundrels who have owned up to a long list of bad behavior, but at least they have owned it. There is some integrity in their "this is me, take it or leave it." stance. It is consistent.
There is no integrity in a man who demurs, deflects and defies his party when they ask him to step aside. "I know your deeds, that you are neither hot nor cold," God says in Revelations 3:15,16. "I wish you were either one or the other. So because you are lukewarm -- neither hot nor cold -- I am about to spit you out of my mouth." that is a perfect definition of a man who lacks integrity.Outraged supporters go a step further to say that if people would just ignore You Tube and all the issues that get us off track, the country would be better off. They believe that issues like the state of marriage and family take us off track when we should be worried about the economy and the environment. He is doing a good job for his constituents, they say. What he does in the privacy of his own gymnasium is his own business.
But is not private, it is a public display of a complete lack of integrity. Integrity is the steadfast adherence to a moral or ethical code. What belief system or code of behavior does this sneaking around serve?
We have been served well by good men whose public and private lives have survived intense scrutiny. John Adams comes to mind. We have possibly been served well by scoundrels who have owned up to a long list of bad behavior, but at least they have owned it. There is some integrity in their "this is me, take it or leave it." stance. It is consistent.
This one man is not my real concern, but the numbers of men who are amusing themselves in this way. How many marriages break because a husband or wife so distances themselves behind the closed door of internet addiction that they destroy the fragile bonds of intimacy?
Marriage is sustained by meaningful conversation, shoulder-to-shoulder labor and mutual joy. Good government is sustained by meaningful dialog, shoulder-to-shoulder labor and mutual respect.
Marriage is sustained by meaningful conversation, shoulder-to-shoulder labor and mutual joy. Good government is sustained by meaningful dialog, shoulder-to-shoulder labor and mutual respect.
Internet addiction is not a recreational pastime. By its very nature it consumes large amounts of time and attention and encourages deception. That is time and attention stolen from wives and children. I can’t think that the electorate, whom offending politicians are sworn to serve, benefit from inconstancy and corruption.
No comments:
Post a Comment